OKEFENOKEE SWAMP AP LANG ESSAY

The author uses different devices throughout the passages to create and convey a certain tone for each swamp. Your Answer is very helpful for Us Thank you a lot! Notify me of new comments via email. Employing imagery, diction, and syntax, this swamp is delineated by two writers. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Both passages contain information of the swamp but each conveys a different tone with the use of its descriptive words and imagery.

It is notable that the writer shies away from writing in detail about dangerous species, keeping their sentence about alligators at the end extremely short. By clicking “SEND”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. The tone the author holds is almost as if he is trying to repel the reader from coming and visiting the swamp. Unlike in the first passage where the figurate language was solely focused on inviting the reader to visit the swamp and enjoy the beauty and serenity the swamp had to offer. The author sees the swamp in the second passage in a more malicious and dark light that almost seems to be repelling the reader.

The figurative language the author uses in the second passage is primarily focused on repelling the reader and persuading them not to come to the swamp and stay in the comforts of their own home.

Okefenokee Swamp Essay

In comparison, the sentences that describe the visual details of moss, water, and flowers are long and cumulative. The author uses different devices throughout the passages to create and convey a certain tone for each swamp. This sentence clearly does not strive to leave a lasting impression on the audience; it is plain and simple, but does emphasize the objectivity of the piece.

  RTU DISSERTATION GUIDELINES

Although he provides information about the swamp, Boyle adds his own opinion making the entire passage subjective. In the first passage the author uses personification to expand and emphasize the beauty of the swamp.

Okefenokee Swamp Ap Lang Essay

In this excerpt the author clearly wants to show that the animals of the swamp are primitive and still need to hunt and brutally slaughter prey to feed themselves.

This site uses cookies. In the second passage, Okefenokee Swamp is portrayed as essayy unpleasant setting with many disturbing features. Hi there, would you like to get such a paper?

Such sentences are okefebokee unlike the first passage, where appealing sentences were lengthy. The fact that the imagery portrays the Swamp negatively reveals his view on how the swamp is disgusting and an abominable place.

Okefenokee Swamp send By clicking “Send”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. In this part of the passage, Boyle focuses solely on insects, which are repulsive to most humans.

okefenokee swamp ap lang essay

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: What is your topic? Let me help you. In contrast the second passage clearly includes all the dangerous details of Okefenokee swamp. In order to emphasize how nasty these creatures are he mentions how they sting, bite, and bore zp humans, making a visit there undesirable.

okefenokee swamp ap lang essay

If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email. In the first passage the swamp is seen as something that holds beauty and is inviting unlike in the second passage where the swamp seems more malicious and repelling.

  YCMOU PHD THESIS

Accessed May 22, When the author describes the different types of trees and animals that inhabit Okefenokee Swamp he only provides generic names; descriptions are excluded: Each passage describes the area with a different purpose and a different view.

Okefenokee Swamp Passage Ap-Lang 11th grade Essay

We will write a custom sample essay on Okefenokee Swamp specifically for you. Leave a Reply Okefenomee reply Enter your comment here The writer uses descriptive words that portray neither positive nor negative connotations. The author sees the swamp in the second passage in a more malicious and dark light that almost seems to be repelling the reader.

It is negative and does not display any of the attributes that are associated with the swamp; instead it is very critical and focuses on all the peculiarities of the swamp. Just like the author did in passage one, Boyle mentions the wildlife of Okefenokee Swamp, yet he is very precise about which species he talks about: Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website.

okefenokew Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website! To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Sorry, but copying text is not allowed on this site. You are commenting using your Twitter account.

Author: admin