The number of items varies across versions but the subscales and their descriptions have remained consistent over time. Watson—Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal: Interpreting the CCST, group norms and sub-scores technical report 4. The result would be that subscale reliabilities are even more volatile and suspect than the general score. Outcomes of the searches and data extraction Two raters were involved in the retrieval task, and they worked independently to assess the relevance of studies. Overall the average correlations ranged from a low of 0. Over 20 norm groups are available for the short form.
Authors Watson and Glaser Obtaining the WGCTA Get Feedback Pearson Assessments Administration, Analysis and Reporting Statistics Solutions consists of a team of professional methodologists and statisticians that can assist the student or professional researcher in administering the survey instrument, collecting the data, conducting the analyses and explaining the results. Overall, however, the two analyses are similar in many respects. Psychological Test Bulletin, 3 2 , 74— The effect of a peer to peer strategy within radiation therapy and nursing clinical settings on the development of critical thinking skills. Research questions Our first research question relates to the 13 inter-correlation matrices from the literature: Introduction Most educators would agree that learning to think is one of the most important goals of formal schooling.
Retrieved July 22, from http: Journal of Experimental Education, 38 411— This fact makes interpretation of the average correlations problematic.
Developing a new critical thinking test using item response theory. Forms A and B.
Academic Medicine, 68, — Want to purchase this test? Columbia University Teachers College.
Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA)
We excluded eight sets because the data were incomplete and two others because data were from only a single version of the WGCTA.
It is likely that these results are high tied to the large thinoing that have been observed in the reliability coefficients of the WGCTA i. The WGCTA, for instance, contains items that are classified in terms of five CT subscales or CT skillsdeduction, recognizing assumptions, deduction, interpretation, and evaluating assumptions.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59 6— Nurse behaviors that rescue patients. Critical thinking skills of baccalaureate nursing students. Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Deduction and interpretation were the highest loading subscales reversed on the two versions and assumption and evaluation were the lowest also reversed.
Overall, however, the two analyses are similar in many respects.
Widener University School of Nursing. The National Reading Conference, Inc.
The Watson-Glaser™ II
High correlations indicate the reverse, that the subscales are largely overlapping in what they are measuring. Evaluation of tools used to measure critical thinking development in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: The number of items varies across versions but the subscales and their descriptions have remained consistent over time.
Women are more predictable than men. Outcomes of the searches and data extraction Two raters were involved in the retrieval task, and they worked independently to assess the relevance of studies.
Critical thinking and learning processes for students in two major fields. Pin Watson-blaser on Pinterest. Author’s personal copy 22 R. We performed a meta-analysis on the inter-correlations of the10 combinations of subscales and found that all of the average correlations that resulted were significant, but that all but one dritical significantly heterogeneous.
Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. The Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal WGCTA contains 80 reading passages presenting problems, statements, arguments, and interpretations, each requiring the application of analytic reasoning skills. It may be that the WGCTA is highly context specific, performing reasonably well with some learners in some settings and more poorly with other learners.
Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) – Statistics Solutions
If the average inter-correlations among the five subscales drawn for the 13 studies of the WGCTA is reasonably high i. Journal of Research in Science Training, 25, — The result of this analysis should shed some criticla on how highly inter-correlated the subscales are and whether the variability around the mean correlation exceeds the expectations of chance fluctuation. Therefore, our second and interrelated question involved an assessment of the relationship of the five subscales to the entire test: Fritical are not the only ones concerned about the urgency of prioritizing the teaching and learning of critical thinking CT.